Ivan V. Grudochko: Kurgans with ‘Moustache’ – The epoch of the late prehistory and Early Middle Ages of the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes (4th–7th AD)

Ivan V. Grudochko: Kurgans with ‘Moustache’ – The epoch of the late prehistory and Early Middle Ages of the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes (4th–7th AD)

39.00

Иван В. Грудочко
КУРГАНЫ С «УСАМИ»
Эпоха поздней древности и раннего средневековья
урало-казахстанских степей (IV–VII вв. н. э.)

Studia ad Archaeologiam Pazmaniensia
A PPKE BTK Régészettudományi Intézetének kiadványai
Archaeological Studies of PPCU Institute of Archaeology
Volume 16

Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont
Magyar Őstörténeti Témacsoport Kiadványok
Volume 9

ISBN 978-963-9987-72-2

Language: Russian with English captions
352 pages
Year of Publication: 2020
Published in Budapest

1 in stock

Weight 1200 g
Dimensions 29 × 21 × 2 cm

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Add a review

This book is dedicated to kurgans with a “mustache” that have been discussed more than 20 years. Then we spoke out that the period of 4th –7th centuries AD in the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes was a “troubled time” we, in fact, have known almost nothing of, and it’s dificult to learn or discover something new here, and the mounds with a “mustache” as awhole were hardly considered as early medieval complexes. However, at a certain point it was noticed that something seemed incorrect about thekurgans with a “mustache”, not because of someoneelse’s misconceptions, but because they are archaeologically very poor sites (figuratively speaking,«ungrateful»). We need to keep in mind that labo-rious excavations of such a complex usually yield nothing but the animal bones and a pot of roughmodeling (sometimes without a pot at all). Thus, they are very complex, very incomprehensible sites and it was necessary a certain time to pass since mycolleagues I. I. Lyubchansky and A. D. Tairov and Iintroduced these sites into the arsenal of early medieval history.
 However, a better justifcation wasnecessary at the next stage, since not all colleagueshad found this suffcient. For example, our Kazakhstani colleagues either defend the “ancient” dateof the kurgans with a “mustache”, or stretch their existence from the Early Saka to the early medie-val era, implying almost a thousand-year history. In order to clearly typologize, prove, and thoroughly and all the arguments that exist in the chronology, typology, and ethnocultural interpretation of thesemonuments, a great deal of work was needed, andit seems to me, I. V. Grudochko successfully copedwith the challenges.
Source